{"id":1986,"date":"2014-09-05T08:00:49","date_gmt":"2014-09-05T15:00:49","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/thewritespot.us\/marlenecullenblog\/?p=1986"},"modified":"2016-07-05T13:37:04","modified_gmt":"2016-07-05T20:37:04","slug":"guest-blogger-arlene-miller-asks-should-we-dumb-down-the-language","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/thewritespot.us\/marlenecullenblog\/guest-blogger-arlene-miller-asks-should-we-dumb-down-the-language\/","title":{"rendered":"Guest blogger Arlene Miller asks, &#8220;Should we dumb down the language?&#8221;"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Guest Blogger Arlene Miller writes:<\/p>\n<p>I am a member of some grammar groups on LinkedIn, where there\u00a0are fascinating \u2014 and long \u2013\u00a0discussions of what some people would call <em>grammatical minutiae<\/em>. However, this week, I saw a discussion that I found a little surprising. The question posed was \u201cShould we continue to teach <em>who <\/em>and <em>whom<\/em> to our students?\u201d the real question is: S<em>hould we continue to teach the difference between them and when to use each<\/em>?<\/p>\n<p>On my blog, <a title=\"bigwords101\" href=\"http:\/\/bigwords101.com\/2014\/blog\/word-crimes-by-weird-al-an-analysis\/\" target=\"_blank\">bigwords 101<\/a>, I talked about the difference between linguistic and grammatical <em>prescriptivism<\/em> and <em>descriptivism:<\/em><\/p>\n<p>\u25aa\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 <em>Prescriptivists<\/em> (the camp that I lean toward) think that the rules are there and they should be followed.<\/p>\n<p>\u25aa\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 <em>Descriptivists<\/em> believe that language evolves as new usages come into play.<\/p>\n<p>Well, if we followed a purely prescriptivist viewpoint, we would still be using the language of centuries ago\u00a0\u2013\u00a0thank you, Chaucer.<\/p>\n<p>But what would happen if we followed a purely descriptivist viewpoint? How does language change, anyway?<\/p>\n<p>Let\u2019s look at an example: I have always used the idiomatic prepositional phrase <em>by accident<\/em>. The younger generation seems to be using <em>on accident<\/em> instead. Is it wrong? Which is right? Should\u00a0we adopt what the younger generation is now using? Is there a reason that <em>by<\/em> should be used rather than <em>on<\/em>? Why did anyone start saying it that way in the first place? Is it because we say its opposite as <em>on purpose<\/em>?<\/p>\n<p>People use <em>who<\/em> and <em>whom<\/em> incorrectly because they don\u2019t know or understand the rule. Should we say, \u201cOh, let\u2019s just forget trying. It\u2019s just too difficult to teach or understand\u201d? Should we <em>dumb down<\/em> the language? Or, should we avoid using <em>whom<\/em>?<\/p>\n<p>Taking <em>who <\/em>and <em>whom<\/em> specifically,\u00a0 there is a reason that <em>who<\/em> is correct sometimes and <em>whom<\/em> is correct other times. And most people studying a foreign language will run across the same thing in that language.<\/p>\n<p>The distinction between <em>who<\/em> and <em>whom<\/em> is the same as the distinction between <em>I <\/em>and <em>me<\/em>. Are we now going to say \u201c<em>Me<\/em> and <em>him<\/em> went to the movies\u201d is okay? If many people say it that way, will that become the standard?<\/p>\n<p>Then, there is the issue of conversation versus formal writing. Let\u2019s say you are writing a cover letter. Are you going to distinguish between <em>who<\/em> and <em>whom<\/em>? All the grammar books I know of make that distinction, at least as of now. I would recommend that anyone writing anything formal use the rules until they are \u201cformally\u201d changed.<\/p>\n<p>The evolution of language is nothing new. And I won\u2019t pretend to know much about it. I am not a linguist, although I wish I were, and I find the subject fascinating. \u00a0I do know that there needs to be a mix of descriptivism and prescriptivism, as there always has been;\u00a0otherwise, the language would never have changed throughout the centuries. But where do we\u00a0draw the line?<\/p>\n<p>But <em>who<\/em> and <em>whom<\/em>? That\u2019s where<strong><em> I <\/em><\/strong>draw the line!<\/p>\n<p>Here is the difference between <em>who <\/em>and <em>whom<\/em>:<\/p>\n<p>There are three cases for pronouns in the English language: Nominative, Objective, and Possessive.<\/p>\n<p>\u25aa\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 The nominative case is used for subjects of sentences (and predicate nominatives, but we won\u2019t go there today).<\/p>\n<p>\u25aa\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 The objective case is used for direct objects, indirect objects, and objects of prepositions, the three types of objects.<\/p>\n<p>\u25aa\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 The possessive case is used for ownership.<\/p>\n<p>Let\u2019s take the pronoun <em>I<\/em>: nominative is <em>I<\/em>; objective is <em>me<\/em>; possessive is <em>my<\/em> or <em>mine.<\/em><\/p>\n<p>\u25aa\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 <em>I <\/em>am going to the movies.<\/p>\n<p>\u25aa\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 He took <em>me<\/em> to the movies.<\/p>\n<p>\u25aa\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 He is <em>mine<\/em>.<\/p>\n<p>Now let\u2019s take the pronoun <em>who<\/em>: nominative is <em>who<\/em>; objective is <em>whom<\/em>; possessive is <em>whose<\/em>.<\/p>\n<p>\u25aa\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 <em>Who<\/em> is going\u00a0to\u00a0the movies? (<em>Who<\/em> is the subject of the verb <em>is\u00a0going<\/em>.)<\/p>\n<p>\u25aa\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 <em>Whom<\/em> did you invite to the movies? (<em>Whom<\/em> is the direct object of the verb <em>invite<\/em>.)<\/p>\n<p>\u25aa\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 To <em>whom<\/em> did you give the movie tickets? (<em>Whom i<\/em>s the object of the preposition <em>to<\/em>.)<\/p>\n<p>\u25aa\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 <em>Whose<\/em> tickets\u00a0are they, anyway?<\/p>\n<p>One thing is for sure. I will be teaching my students the difference between who and <em>whom!<\/em><\/p>\n<p>Click <a title=\"bigwords101\" href=\"http:\/\/bigwords101.com\/2014\/blog\/whom-cares\/\" target=\"_blank\">here<\/a> to read the original blog post &#8220;&#8216;Whom&#8217; Cares?&#8221; by Arlene Miller.<\/p>\n<p><em>\u00a0<a href=\"http:\/\/thewritespot.us\/marlenecullenblog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2014\/09\/Arlene-Miller.jpg\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"wp-image-5750 size-thumbnail alignleft\" src=\"http:\/\/thewritespot.us\/marlenecullenblog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2014\/09\/Arlene-Miller-150x150.jpg\" alt=\"Arlene Miller\" width=\"150\" height=\"150\" \/><\/a><\/em><a title=\"Arlene Miller\" href=\"http:\/\/bigwords101.com\/about-us\/\" target=\"_blank\">Arlene Miller<\/a>, also known as The Grammar Diva, is the author of four grammar books and a novel. Her first grammar book, <em>The Best Little Grammar Book Ever,<\/em> is being used by many schools and colleges. Arlene&#8217;s grammar books clear up common grammar issues. In addition to writing books, Arlene writes a weekly blog post about grammar, punctuation, and anything else to do with words. She is also a copyeditor for both fiction and nonfiction books, teaches 7th grade English in Petaluma, teaches The Best Little Grammar Class Ever at College of Marin, and teaches corporate grammar and business writing workshops.<\/p>\n<p>Arlene has been a presenter at the Sonoma County Book Festival, Bay Area Independent Publishing Association (BAIPA), Petaluma and Guerneville branches of the Sonoma County Library, Romance Writers of America, Society of Technical Communications, and Redwood Writers Academy. She is a member of Redwood Writers and BAIPA. She holds degrees in Print Media, English, Humanities, and California teaching and school administration credentials.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Guest Blogger Arlene Miller writes: I am a member of some grammar groups on LinkedIn, where there\u00a0are fascinating \u2014 and long \u2013\u00a0discussions of what some people would call grammatical minutiae. However, this week, I saw a discussion that I found a little surprising. The question posed was \u201cShould we continue to teach who and whom [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"sfsi_plus_gutenberg_text_before_share":"","sfsi_plus_gutenberg_show_text_before_share":"","sfsi_plus_gutenberg_icon_type":"","sfsi_plus_gutenberg_icon_alignemt":"","sfsi_plus_gutenburg_max_per_row":"","jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":"","jetpack_publicize_message":"","jetpack_publicize_feature_enabled":true,"jetpack_social_post_already_shared":true,"jetpack_social_options":{"image_generator_settings":{"template":"highway","default_image_id":0,"font":"","enabled":false},"version":2}},"categories":[104],"tags":[554,555],"class_list":["post-1986","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-guest-bloggers","tag-arlene-miller","tag-bigwords101"],"jetpack_publicize_connections":[],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/p43Dj8-w2","_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/thewritespot.us\/marlenecullenblog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1986","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/thewritespot.us\/marlenecullenblog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/thewritespot.us\/marlenecullenblog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/thewritespot.us\/marlenecullenblog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/thewritespot.us\/marlenecullenblog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=1986"}],"version-history":[{"count":7,"href":"https:\/\/thewritespot.us\/marlenecullenblog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1986\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":5751,"href":"https:\/\/thewritespot.us\/marlenecullenblog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1986\/revisions\/5751"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/thewritespot.us\/marlenecullenblog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1986"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/thewritespot.us\/marlenecullenblog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=1986"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/thewritespot.us\/marlenecullenblog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=1986"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}